Provide the SKU and packed dimensions, dispatch point, destination, promised delivery window, tracking requirement, and fallback. AIDrop Agent compares viable services and landed-cost exposure; no route is universally cheapest or fastest.
Carrier selection comes after these inputs. Compare chargeable weight, destination coverage, tracking, customs exposure, delivery window, landed cost, and what happens when the route leaves the normal path.
Check category restrictions, value, fragility, batteries, liquids, dimensions, and any customs or carrier limits before comparing price.
Use the final packed dimensions and chargeable weight—not the bare product weight—to compare route economics and packaging trade-offs.
Match the route to destination coverage, declarations, duties, remote-area exposure, and likely clearance or disruption points.
Balance the customer-facing window with tracking visibility, handoff quality, service consistency, and support risk.
Define who acts when a scan is missing, a route is interrupted, delivery fails, or a return or reshipment is required.
A route choice should state what is optimized and which risks remain.
May prioritize cost but can require different expectations for speed, tracking, or disruption response.
Seeks a practical compromise across cost, tracking, speed, and coverage.
May prioritize speed or service visibility while accepting higher cost or product constraints.
Dispatch readiness connects stock, product accuracy, packing, labels, address, documentation, and the selected route.
Correct item, variant, quantity, condition, and approved packaging.
Valid address, service selection, labels, declarations, and required order references.
Carrier or route acceptance, initial scan expectations, and tracking/status return.
Classify the event, identify the affected parcels, set the customer message or refund/reship action, and record what must change before the next shipment uses the same route.
Identify the event and the last reliable status or evidence.
Assign the next action to fulfillment, carrier, store, customer, or another responsible party.
Use repeated disruptions to change route, packing, address checks, promise, inventory, or customer communication.
Carrier relationships and consolidated shipping volume can improve access to route options and commercial rates. The operational value is broader: one China-side coordination layer can compare services, prepare handoff data, return tracking, and own route exceptions without the store managing each carrier conversation.
That can save purchasing time and management attention, but no single route is always cheapest or fastest. Weight, dimensions, destination, customs exposure, delivery promise, and exception cost still determine the useful choice.
Parcel profile — packed weight, dimensions, product restrictions, and destination mix.
Route economics — freight, surcharges, customs exposure, delivery window, and reship risk.
Visibility — acceptance scan, tracking quality, delivery status, and customer-facing updates.
Exception ownership — who investigates delays, failed delivery, damage, or return-to-sender events.
The correct output is a documented route assumption and fallback—not an unqualified “lowest price” promise.
No. Delivery depends on product, packing, route, carrier, destination, customs, last mile, and external disruptions. The route review clarifies assumptions and exception handling.
Not necessarily. Compare product eligibility, cost, tracking, coverage, reliability, customer expectation, and disruption response.
The expected events and connection method are confirmed during onboarding. The workflow should define the tracking source, store status, failed-update owner, and customer communication path.
Share the product, packed profile, dispatch point, destination, required tracking, and delivery target. The first review will expose missing inputs, viable route families, and the fallback that needs approval.
